Premium

Opinion QCOs on inputs a ‘malign intervention’, hurt MSMEs: NITI Aayog VC Suman Bery

Bery’s remarks followed the release of a report on boosting India’s power and hand tool exports, which called for easing QCOs on steel and polymers

QCOs on inputs a ‘malign intervention’, hurt MSMEs, says NITI Aayog VC Bery

Suman Bery, NITI Aayog Vice Chairperson. (File Photo)

New DelhiApril 16, 2025 06:33 AM IST First published on: Apr 16, 2025 at 04:00 AM IST

Quality control orders (QCOs) for inputs are a “malign intervention” to restrict imports and lead to high costs for MSMEs, NITI Aayog Vice Chairperson Suman Bery said Tuesday. Bery’s remarks followed the release of a report on boosting India’s power and hand tool exports, which called for easing QCOs on steel and polymers to give manufacturers greater access to cheaper raw materials and make exports more competitive.

“My understanding is that we are, unlike certain countries, so keen to be WTO (World Trade Organization) compliant, that we are looking for other ways to keep certain inputs out, and these quality control orders are the mechanisms we have arrived at,” Bery said at a media briefing.

WTO rules limit the quantum of tariffs on most tariff lines, hence several countries, including India, have increased use of non-tariff trade barriers like quality norms to curb imports.

Also Read | Talks with the US to be based on ‘true picture’ of bilateral trade: Govt

“It takes a certain genius for the bureaucracy to come up with an intervention which is even more malign (than tariffs) because of arbitrariness. All these compliance costs are murder for MSMEs,” Bery added.

Bery is also Chairperson of the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister (EAC-PM).

QCOs require foreign exporters and domestic producers to mandatorily meet specific quality norms to obtain a certification from the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), without which they cannot sell covered products in the Indian market.

In effect, a QCO is a type of technical regulation that can act as a barrier to trade for foreign exporters. As of March 12, India had issued 187 QCOs covering 769 products.

In the case of QCOs on inputs, such intervention can also block access to imported – and often cheaper – raw materials for domestic downstream users. QCOs on input goods range from man-made fibres and chemicals to metals such as steel and copper.

Also Read | The fight to remain ‘small’: Micro segment players, mid-sized firms spar over MSME classification tweak in Budget

India’s cost disadvantage in power and hand tools, which require raw materials like steel and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), is between 14-17 per cent compared to China, according to NITI Aayog’s new report.

“Higher raw material costs, exacerbated by import restrictions like Quality Control Orders (QCOs), increase production expenses,” the report said.

“QCO restrictions on these raw materials such as steel and PVC add to the adversities of Indian manufacturers by increasing their dependence on higher cost domestic industry,” it added.

Earlier this year, in a pre-Budget meeting with the Chief Economic Advisor and Finance Ministry officials, the Federation of Indian Micro and Small & Medium Enterprises (FISME) said the use of tariff and non-tariff barriers like QCOs on the import of critical raw materials such as steel, copper, aluminum, and polymers is creating an uncompetitive environment for Indian industries, particularly MSMEs.

The report also identified low labour productivity due to restrictive overtime wage rules, lack of sufficient land to expand industrial clusters, and limited tech access as key barriers undermining the sector’s global competitiveness.

“It is estimated that India could export $25 billion worth of tools and create 3.5 million jobs by 2035 with a competitive and strong manufacturing ecosystem,” it said.

India’s annual tool exports hover around $1 billion, accounting for just 1 per cent of the global share – compared to China’s 50 per cent.