Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

“Jurisprudence in an evolved society presupposes that the ultimate goal of penal sanctions is to reform the individual and not eradicate his/her personality,” a Delhi High Court bench remarked Wednesday, while directing Tihar jail to consider granting furlough to a 65-year-old man.
Furlough is leave from jail granted for a certain period of time in a year to inmates serving sentences. “As wisely put in verse, if a soul is shut out, it is extinguished,” a bench of Justice S Ravindra Bhat and Justice A K Chawla said.
“He is not a lifer; no doubt the crimes he was convicted of were serious and he, therefore, received his just desserts so to speak. Yet, he is not beyond redemption,” it added.
The bench was hearing Sudhir Sharma’s appeal against the single bench order, which had dismissed his plea to quash the decision of jail authorities denying him furlough. Sharma had requested furlough in 2017 to re-establish social ties with his family and society.
He was convicted in six cheating cases and is currently serving sentence at Tihar jail. He had submitted before the High Court bench that despite a satisfactory conduct, he was denied furlough on the ground that he is a “habitual offender”.
He had contended before the court that all the cases against him were of the same nature and had common investigating officers and witnesses, yet deliberately, different cases and chargesheets were filed at different times, with the intent of keeping him in judicial custody for long. Sharma has been in jail for more than 10 years now.
But the bench said: “No doubt, there is similarity of these offences. Yet, it would be difficult to characterise that he was a habitual offender…”
Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram