Premium
This is an archive article published on June 29, 2010

Land once acquired need not be returned to original owners: state

The state government has held that they are at liberty to use acquired lands for any other purpose if the purpose for which the land was acquired has been achieved.

The state government has held that they are at liberty to use acquired lands for any other purpose if the purpose for which the land was acquired has been achieved.

The legal heirs of the erstwhile owner of the lands in Dahisar claimed that instead of expanding the existing Remote Receiving Station by the Airports Authority of India,the Mumbai International Airport Private Limited,which subsequently took over airport operations,is planning to use 50 per cent of the land to resettle and rehabilitate people who have encroached upon the airport land.

The affidavit filed by Kishore Agraharkar,special land acquisition officer,states that “lands once acquired for a public purpose cannot be returned to original owners.”

Story continues below this ad

“As per Supreme Court judgment land once acquired for public purpose need not be given back. It’s upto the airport authorities to decide what to do with the land,” said assistant government pleader G W Mattos.

The legal heirs,reclaiming the two tracts of land measuring 12 acres,stated that the land will be used for rehabilitation of encroachers instead of expanding the RRS as revealed in an earlier affidavit filed by the authorities.

Petitioner Anwar Hajee Cassum Agboatwala and other legal heirs state that such a change of purpose is not permissible even if it is assumed it is for a public purpose.

The land in question,around 12 acres,belonged to original owner Alimohammed Agboatwala who died in 1946. His widow had then moved a suit for administration of all his estates—including the lands in question—subsequent to which a court receiver was appointed.

Story continues below this ad

Later,the state government started acquiring these lands as well as some adjoining lands for setting up the RRS.

The petitioners’ state that the lands were handed over by the government to the airports authority in October 2007 with directions to remove encroachments from them within three months.

The petition states that two years have gone by but no action has been initiated by the AAI as there is no longer RRS expansion.

The petition also claims that even existing RRS has not been used by the airports authority for several years.

Story continues below this ad

Agboatwala has urged the court to call for the records,set aside the acquisition proceedings and hand over the land back to the court receiver.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement