Premium
This is an archive article published on January 15, 2010

State just wants status quo on traffic scheme: green group

The Bombay Environmental Action Group,which is battling for decongestion of city traffic through implementation of the Traffic Restraint Scheme...

The Bombay Environmental Action Group (BEAG),which is battling for decongestion of city traffic through implementation of the Traffic Restraint Scheme,submitted in the court on Wednesday that the “endeavour of the state government is essentially to maintain the status quo and the unfortunate approach of incentivising and giving preference to private transport vehicles over public transport.”

The BEAG stated that the Maharashtra government should implement the Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS),at least on select routes,within a time frame not exceeding four months.

The written submissions have been filed based on a PIL filed by BEAG and the Smoke Affected Residents’ Forum seeking the implementation of the Traffic Restraint System (TRS) in Mumbai. It stated that after having made a clear commitment in its affidavit of 2001,the state government has gone back on its decision to implement TRS as a pilot project.

Story continues below this ad

The petitioner has pointed out that pollution levels in the city,particularly of suspended particulate matter,remain much higher than the norms stipulated by the Central Pollution Control Board. Over 90 percent of the population of this city do not have access to private transport vehicles while 85 percent of 16,31,837 vehicles registered in the city in 2008 are private transport vehicles,the submission says.

“In other words,under 10 percent of the population of the city is utilising a completely disproportionate amount of road space to the prejudice of the general commuting public,which utilises public transport,” the submissions states,seeking “some form of restraint on the growth and use of private vehicles”.

The court last year observed that the government is not ready to experiment with the TRS and was instead depending on hordes of infrastructure projects and enhancement of public transport system.

“By developing infrastructure you are not going to solve this mess,” the court had then observed.

The court has adjourned the hearing till February 24.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments