Premium
This is an archive article published on April 2, 2015

Centre moves SC for review of verdict scrapping quota for Jats

Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh said the review plea was filed on Wednesday.

2G probe, 2G spectrum scam, 2G spectrum case, CBI, Supreme Court, 2G spectrum scam case, Subramanian Swamy, 2G spectrum allocation, 2G spectrum probe, CBI 2G probe, coal block allocation cases, india news, nation news ‘Void for vagueness’ doctrine exists as a tool for decision-makers to temper down ill-effects of legislative enactments.

Government has moved the Supreme Court seeking review of its March 17 verdict setting aside a 2014 notification of erstwhile UPA regime to include Jats in the central list of the Other Backward Classes (OBC) in nine states to accord quota benefits to them.

The NDA government moved the apex court days after a meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi who assured the community leaders that his dispensation would try to find a solution within the legal framework.

[related-post]

The Centre, in its review plea, has said “the Centre’s power to make available quota for a community is not dependent on the advice of the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC)”.

Story continues below this ad

Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh said the review plea was filed on Wednesday.

While dismissing a petition by a group of Jat students seeking benefits of reservation under the OBC category in post-graduate medical and dental courses two days ago, the apex court, however, said the NCBC’s recommendations would be ordinarily binding on the government.

The government’s plea further said the test laid down by the apex court in the Mandal judgement for determination of “social, educational and economic backwardness” of Jats had been complied with.

The decision to include Jats in Central OBC list was taken after various state panels furnished reports favouring the inclusion, it said.

Story continues below this ad

Earlier, a bench of justices Ranjan Gogoi and R F Nariman, setting aside the March 4, 2014 notification that had enabled Jats to claim reservation in nine states, had said that “possible wrong inclusions” cannot be the basis of further inclusion, and reservation should be given only to the “most distressed”.

It had referred to various constitutional schemes and the NCBC report and said the finding of the OBC panel that Jats do not deserve to be given quota benefits was “supported by good and acceptable reasons”.

The court also said the NCBC had considered reports of state backward classes panels and other literature on the subject before recommending that Jats should not be included in the list of OBCs.

The Jats were included in the central list OBCs for getting reservation in states like Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement