Premium
This is an archive article published on July 28, 2020

Rajasthan Assembly Speaker withdraws plea in SC against initial order of HC

The High Court had extended until July 24 the time given by the Speaker to 19 Congress rebel MLAs, seeking their response to the disqualification notices he had served.

Rajasthan Assembly Speaker withdraws plea in SC against initial order of HC The Supreme Court Monday allowed Rajasthan Assembly Speaker CP Joshi to withdraw his petition challenging the Rajasthan High Court order of July 21. (File photo)

The Supreme Court Monday allowed Rajasthan Assembly Speaker CP Joshi to withdraw his petition challenging the Rajasthan High Court order of July 21.

The High Court had extended until July 24 the time given by the Speaker to 19 Congress rebel MLAs, seeking their response to the disqualification notices he had served.

The bench of Justices Arun Mishra, B R Gavai and Krishna Murari allowed the Speaker to withdraw his petition after senior advocate Kapil Sibal said the HC had subsequently passed a detailed order on July 24 in view of which the petitioner wanted to withdraw the challenge to the earlier order and take appropriate legal recourse against the later order.

Story continues below this ad

Rajasthan governor stalls call for House session | ‘Why the silence on trust vote’

“Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned senior counsel, has submitted that the High Court has passed a detailed order and the ad interim order passed has merged into the final interim order that has been passed by the High Court. Thus, he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as against the subsequent order. Accordingly, the special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty,” the bench said.

Hearing the Speaker’s appeal on July 23, the bench had refused to stay the HC order and said it needed to hear the matter in detail to decide the question of jurisdiction.

The bench said this after Sibal argued that as per the 1992 judgment of the Constitution Bench in Kihoto Hollohan vs Zachillhu & Others, courts had no jurisdiction to interfere in disqualification proceedings by the Speaker, under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution, before a final decision has been made.

Story continues below this ad

Rajasthan Congress rebel MLAs, led by Sachin Pilot, had approached the High Court against the disqualification notices issued by the Speaker. The HC, in its initial order on July 21, asked the Speaker to give them time until July 24 to reply to the notices.

Later, on July 24, the HC directed that status quo of July 14 be maintained on the notices.

Ananthakrishnan G. is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express. He has been in the field for over 23 years, kicking off his journalism career as a freelancer in the late nineties with bylines in The Hindu. A graduate in law, he practised in the District judiciary in Kerala for about two years before switching to journalism. His first permanent assignment was with The Press Trust of India in Delhi where he was assigned to cover the lower courts and various commissions of inquiry. He reported from the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India during his first stint with The Indian Express in 2005-2006. Currently, in his second stint with The Indian Express, he reports from the Supreme Court and writes on topics related to law and the administration of justice. Legal reporting is his forte though he has extensive experience in political and community reporting too, having spent a decade as Kerala state correspondent, The Times of India and The Telegraph. He is a stickler for facts and has several impactful stories to his credit. ... Read More

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Loading Taboola...
Advertisement