Premium
This is an archive article published on March 29, 2024

Reply to appeals within 18 days: Court directs Jindal varsity on suspension of 2 students over ‘Ram Mandir discussion’

Over a month after they were suspended for a semester and evicted from the varsity campus housing, the two students of O P Jindal University turned to the Punjab & Haryana High Court for justice.

Punjab & Haryana High Court, Ram Mandir, Yogi Adityanath, Ram temple inaguration, Ayodhya Ram temple inaguration, Ram temple, Ayodhya Ram temple, Lucknow news, Uttar pradesh news, Lucknow, India news, Indian express, Indian express India news, Indian express India Following the action taken against them, the students had also written to the varsity on February 21, appealing against the decision made by the University Student Disciplinary Committee (USDC) to suspend them until August 1.

“Reply within 18 days”, the Punjab & Haryana High Court has directed O P Jindal University to respond to appeals filed by its two students who were suspended and evicted from the varsity campus housing for allegedly putting up posters and engaging in a panel discussion regarding the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya.

An order passed by the court on March 21 read: “…The civil writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 2 (vice-chancellor of O P Jindal)  to consider and decide the said appeals dated 21.02.2024… in accordance with law, within a period of 18 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the present order”, and further asked the varsity to consider both the cases of the students independently “in accordance with law”.

Over a month after they were suspended for a semester and evicted from the varsity campus housing, the two students of O P Jindal University turned to the Punjab & Haryana High Court for justice. In their petition against the varsity and its vice-chancellor on Monday, the students sought that the show-cause and suspension notices they received in February be quashed on account of “the fact that (it) has been issued without following a due process as prescribed in the policy book of the university and the O P Jindal student’s code of conduct…”

Story continues below this ad

The petition further said that the University be directed “to remove/ rectify any record on the file of the petitioners (two students) with respect to the show-cause notice… and suspension notice” Following the action taken against them, the students had also written to the varsity on February 21, appealing against the decision made by the University Student Disciplinary Committee (USDC) to suspend them until August 1.

The students’ appeal read: “We contend that the decision to suspend us for an entire semester was made by the USDC without following the principles of natural justice, as a fair opportunity for a hearing was not provided to us. In fact, the entire process of the disciplinary proceedings initiated against us lacked any due process and, hence, stands against the principles of natural justice.” Hours after they were suspended, the two students alleged that they were “manhandled” and asked to “vacate their hostels in the middle of the night” on February 10. A purported video shows one of the students being evicted from the hostel and dragged out by security staff.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments