Journalism of Courage
Premium

SC agrees to hear Centre’s plea for recall of April 26 default bail ruling

Mehta said the decision in Ritu Chhabaria is per incuriam as it has failed to consider the prior binding decision of a co-equal bench in the case, Dinesh Dalmia vs CBI, “which lays down a contrary principle of law, which has held the field for the past 16 years”.

Supreme Court, Centre’s plea, recall of its April 26 ruling, CJI D Y Chandrachud, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, Ritu Chhabaria vs Union of India & Ors, indian express, indian express news“Every investigation cannot be completed within 60 days,” Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said. (Express Photo)
Advertisement
Listen to this article Your browser does not support the audio element.

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court will on May 4 hear the Centre’s plea seeking recall of its April 26 ruling which said that “without completing the investigation of a case, a chargesheet or prosecution complaint cannot be filed by an investigating agency only to deprive an arrested accused of his right to default bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC”.

Agreeing to look into it, a two-judge bench presided by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud on Monday also directed that “in the meantime, in the event that any other applications have been filed before any other court on the basis of the judgment of which recall is sought, they shall be presently deferred beyond 4 May 2023”.

The April 26 judgement by a two-judge bench in the case Ritu Chhabaria vs Union of India & Ors., deprecated what is said is the “practice” of investigating agencies filing chargesheet in court even before completion of the probe so as to deny default bail to accused and said that even in such cases, the right of the accused to default bail will not be extinguished.

Monday, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Additional Solicitor General S V Raju while mentioning an appeal challenging a Delhi High Court order granting bail to an accused in a case probed by the Enforcement Directorate, told the CJI-led bench that the HC had based its decision on the SC judgement in the Ritu Chhabaria case.

Mehta said investigative agencies are duty-bound to file chargesheet in 60 or 90 days as the case may be and that under section 173(8) of CrPC, they can seek further investigation.

“Every investigation cannot be completed within 60 days,” he said.

ASG Raju drew the court’s attention to the implications of the ruling, especially in cases where there are more than one accused and investigation is complete only against some and is pending against others. He pointed out that applications were being filed across the country citing the April 26 ruling.

Mehta said the decision in Ritu Chhabaria is per incuriam as it has failed to consider the prior binding decision of a co-equal bench in the case, Dinesh Dalmia vs CBI, “which lays down a contrary principle of law, which has held the field for the past 16 years”.

Story continues below this ad

It is also contrary to the decision of a larger bench in Vipul Shital Prasad Agarwal vs State of Gujarat and Another, he added.

The SG added that 15 applications had already been filed before various courts across the country based on the Ritu Chhabaria decision and urged the court to say the same may not be relied on till the court takes up the matter on May 4. However, the CJI said that it will be far fetched to say that a judgment be not relied upon.

My Express

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram

Tags:
  • Supreme Cort
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us
Express InvestigationAfter tax havens, dirty money finds a new home: Cryptocurrency
X