SC tells lawyer seeking probe into 2021 Tripura violence to approach HC

The court also protected him from any coercive action.

The Tripura government also pointed out that the state HC had already taken suo-motu cognisance of the incidents, and the matter is pending before it. (File)

The Supreme Court on Friday asked a lawyer who had sought an independent probe into alleged instances of communal violence in Tripura to approach the state High Court which has already taken suo-motu cognisance of the issue.

“If the High Court is seized of the matter at the moment, our taking up the case now will be an expression of no confidence in one of our high courts. We should wait for the outcome,” a bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and Surya Kant said, allowing petitioner Ehtesham Hashmi to intervene in the proceedings pending before the HC.

The court also protected him from any coercive action.

Appearing for Hashmi, Advocate Prashant Bhushan said the HC proceedings are not on the laxity or complicity on the part of the state but on the aspect of compensation. He added that the petitioner is a lawyer based in Delhi and that “Tripura Police have been threatening these people and there are cases under Unlawful Activities Prevention Act”.

Story continues below this ad

But the SC bench said “we will give you permission to intervene and assist the High Court and let the HC look into the matter being raised by you here…we will protect you and you can participate in a video conferencing process subject to the HC allowing this”.

Hashmi, whose Twitter bio refers to him as “Advocate, Supreme Court of India” and “Member, AICC Legal Cell (SC)”, had contended that he was one of the of the members of a team that drew up the fact-finding report titled ‘Humanity Under Attack in Tripura — #Muslim Lives Matter’.

His petition said he was constrained to approach the court to seek its urgent intervention “in respect of a series of hate crimes that took place between 13.10.2021 and 27.10.2021 in Tripura”. He contended that despite the gravity and magnitude of the incidents, no concrete steps were taken by the state police against the alleged miscreants and rioters.

Denying the allegations, the state said the report “is a unilateral, exaggerated and distorted version of incidents… and has no veracity in the eyes of law” and termed it “sponsored” and “self-serving”. The affidavit said “the situation in the… state has all along been under control of the law enforcing machinery”.

Story continues below this ad

The Tripura government also pointed out that the state HC had already taken suo-motu cognisance of the incidents, and the matter is pending before it. The state government said the petitioners could approach the HC if they wanted.

In response to last year’s violence, the state’s affidavit said, 27 people have been arrested so far and 157 persons/organisations have been served with notices.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram