A person cannot be a judge in his own case: SC

A bench of Justices while rejecting the plea of the Board held the view that "a person cannot be a judge in his own case."

Holding the view that “a person cannot be a judge in his own case,” the Supreme Court has ordered reinstatement of an employee sacked 16 years ago by the Cantonment Board, Pune.

A bench of Justices A K Mathur and L S Panta while rejecting the plea of the Board that the principle of “no work no pay” should apply, ruled that aggrieved employee Vijay D Wani would be entitled to 50 per cent back wages and continuity of service.

“Once the disciplinary committee finds the incumbent guilty, they cannot sit in judgement

to punish the man on the basis of the opinion formed by them,” the apex court observed while dismissing the appeal filed by the Board against a Bombay High Court judgement.

Story continues below this ad

The Bombay High Court had earlier passed a similar order of reinstatement with 50 per cent back wages, which was challenged by way of appeal in the apex court by the Board. Vijay, who worked as a section engineer, was sacked by the board on October 25, 1991 on the basis of an inquiry committee report which held him guilty of preparing estimates for certain works with “total non-application of mind”.

The aggrieved engineer filed an appeal before the GOC-in-Chief, Southern Command, Pune who dismissed it and his second appeal before the Ministry of Defence met the same fate, following which he appealed in the High Court.

While rejecting some of Vijay’s arguments, the High Court however, upheld Vijay’s contention that the action was vitiated as the three-member inquiry committee also participated in the deliberations of the subsequent Board meeting which voted in favour of the engineer’s dismissal.