Premium
This is an archive article published on March 6, 2007

Badal cautioned on water Act

Barely two days after new Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal vowed to scrap Section 5 of the Punjab Termination of Agreements Act...

.

Barely two days after new Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal vowed to scrap Section 5 of the Punjab Termination of Agreements Act (PTAA), the Centre has told him not to go ahead with the move.

Section 5 of the Act safeguards the usage of the present quantum of river water by Rajasthan (11.2 million acre feet) and Haryana (7.8 million acre feet). The Amarinder Singh government had got the Act passed at a special session of Punjab Vidhan Sabha in 2004 to knock down the very basis of the SC order on the construction of SYL canal passed on June 4, 2003.

Union Water Resources Minister Saifuddin Soz today advised Badal to resolve the issue through dialogue. Any unilateral action could complicate the issue, he said, while emphasising that it would not be in the interest of Punjab as well as Rajasthan and Haryana. Soz told reporters that a reference had been made to the Supreme Court for sharing waters of common rivers and Badal should wait for the decision of the apex court. He suggested talks among chief ministers of the three states and offered to join the discussions if they so desired. He said the three states should reach a compromise on the basis of “equity and justice.”

Story continues below this ad

By pushing through the Act, Amarinder Singh had hijacked a major emotive issue from the Akalis even at the cost of annoying his own Congress high command. The party leadership was particularly unhappy because he had struck a few months before Assembly polls in Haryana. The Akalis, after having been outmanoeuvered, still tried to be one-up on Amarinder. They promised to do away even with Section 5.

Responding to the announcement, the former CM today maintained that Badal could not do so as the matter was sub judice. He told reporters at Chandigarh that any such action would amount to challenging the Punjab Reorganisation Act of 1966, which stipulated that Haryana and Rajasthan would continue to get water as per their existing shares.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement