
• This is with reference to the feature, ‘‘Turbanators’’, by Manraj Grewal. To describe turbaned Sikh models as ‘‘bearded hunks’’ is being impolite to say the least. Even the headline, ‘‘Turbanators’’, is pretty flippant. A sentence like ‘‘…director Anil Sharma who proved the commercial viability of a turban in Bollywood’’, is upsetting because, for the Sikhs, a turban is a part of their being, not a brand to be marketed.
Maj Gen Himmat Singh Gill (Retd)
• With reference to the news story, ‘‘Cong puts it in black and white: we lack ideas, identity’’, it
Sridharan
• This is with reference to Tavleen Singh’s column, ‘‘Why its Islam vs rest of the world’’. Contrary to what she says, Islam has never opposed any kind of modernisation. On the other hand, if, by modernisation, she refers to nudity, then that should be unacceptable to all, not just Muslims. Tavleen has only focussed on one side of the coin. She has given a clean chit to the rest of the world. I hope she focuses next on how the world behaves with Muslims. If Muslims don’t press the world to follow their ‘non-changing’’ culture, why should the rest force Muslims to accept its ‘‘ever-changing’’ culture?
Dr Rehan Ansari
• Tavleen Singh has hit the nail on the head by asking why Muslims leave their countries for the US and UK despite their condemnation of the West. There can be little doubt that the Muslim world has ignored globalisation, modernity and technology only because of their religious fanaticism. As individuals, they favour progress and intellectual enlightenment. Yet, as a society and culture, they have remained imprisoned in the watertight compartments of their faith, social norms and religious law. It is painful that they have resorted to violence to curb any opposition to their ideology. This has been the main source of the rise of terrorism. This senseless violence has only brought more backwardness to the Muslim society, leading to their isolation in the world.
Ved Guliani
• In his column, ‘‘What they don’t tell you about India Shining’’, P. Chidambaram has rightly stated that ‘‘…child labour is another glaring, and persistent, violation of human rights’’. While child labour in industries may be banned, what about the children who work in most households — washing clothes, washing utensils, cleaning rooms etc. at an age when they should be in school.
Mahesh Kumar
Write to yourvoice@expressindia.com


