Premium
This is an archive article published on October 26, 2005

For Sri Lanka, much-vaunted bowling fell flat

Sri Lanka appeared to have lost both heart and the hope to dream of a possible victory when the Indians ended their innings at 350 runs. And...

.

Sri Lanka appeared to have lost both heart and the hope to dream of a possible victory when the Indians ended their innings at 350 runs. And their misery was compounded when they lost early wickets — beginning with skipper Marvan Attapattu — and then lost their way.

However, it was one cardinal error that cost Sri Lanka the match: an inability of their bowlers to cope with the lifeless Nagpur pitch. Few of the Lankan slow bowlers use flight, they mostly thrive on bowling from wicket to wicket.

And so Maharoof, Dilshan, Arnold and Chandana, even the experienced Chaminda Vaas, struggled on the wicket.

Story continues below this ad

In comparison to the Lankans, Harbhajan Singh played the perfect foil for the Lankan line-up, also going by the fact that the pitch had begun to deteriorate by then.

While Atapattu may still believe that there isn’t much of a difference between the conditions back in Sri Lanka and here, he’ll be hoping that the other tracks don’t behave like this one.

It may just be a vain hope. The rest of the wickets in this series, with the exception of Vadodara, have tracks similar to the one here.

The recent Challenger Trophy at Mohali saw over 500 runs scored in most of the matches, while the Ahmedabad, Rajkot and Pune wickets are also perfect for batting.

Story continues below this ad

With the Indian batting striking form, and Sachin Tendulkar deciding to cut loose from the start, there’s an uphill task ahead of Atapattu’s men.

The Sri Lankan captain will also have to tie up a few ends as far as his team is concerned. Though he couldn’t help the way Tendulkar, Pathan and Dravid batted, there were a few chinks in the armour that were shown up.

For starters, the fielding appeared to have fallen apart after an impressive start in the morning.

In comparison to Atapattu, Dravid proved to be excellent out in the middle, bringing in the right changes at the right time, that led to the downfall of Jayasuriya and Jayawardene.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement