Reaffirming its trust in a special team from Maharashtra which is probing the fake stamp scandal, the Bombay High Court on Thursday kept on hold a decision to hand over the case to the CBI. A division bench comprising Chief Justice C K Thakker and Justice Abhay Oka, however, asked the investigators to cooperate with the central agency which is investigating the racket in other states. Sharma being wrongly targeted: Counsel EXPRESS NEWS SERVICE Mumbai, November 27 Former Mumbai police commissioner R.S. Sharma is ‘‘guilty of woeful dereliction of duty, poor professional response and failure to personally intervene and take immediate correctives in several situations.’’ That is the essence of the charges framed against Sharma by investigators probing the multi-crore fake stamps racket run by Abdul Karim Telgi. Eight of Sharma’s nine acts of ‘‘omission and commission,’’ which the Special Investigation Team (SIT) has mentioned in a report, are mentioned in the chargesheet. Details of the charges were first reported by NDTV 24x7. The charges against Sharma are: • He failed to personally intervene and take immediate corrective steps while filing a chargesheet and applying the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) in the case. He was commissioner in Pune where the first case was registered by on June 7, 2002. • He failed to look at the case papers when then additional commissioner (crime) S.M. Mushriff alleged that names had been included and deleted from the chargesheet. • Asoke Basak, additional chief secretary (Home), told Sharma about the bribe demanded by ACP Mulani, a member of the investigating team in Pune. Sharma did not remove Mulani from the team. • Sharma failed to restore command and control when differences surfaced between Additional Commissioner Mushriff and the investigating officer. • As commissioner of Pune, Sharma knew that the joint commissioner and additional commissioner had scuttled a proposal to apply MCOCA, and when they eventually applied it, the charges were framed in a defective manner. But Sharma didn’t rectify the defects. • DIG Subodh Jaiswal of SIT and Sri Kumar, additional director general of Karnataka Police, briefed Sharma on January 9, 2003 when they found Telgi at his Cuffe Parade flay instead of being in police custody. Sharma (as Mumbai commissioner) had ordered the suspension of assistant inspector Dilip Kamath, officer in charge, but failed to ensure compliance of his orders. • An officer from the CID’s MCOCA cell had submitted to then joint commissioner S S Vagal a report regarding scrutiny of cases of counterfeit stamps registered in Mumbai since 1991. Vagal (later arrested in the case) was member of a special task force formed to investigate the case while Sharma was its chairman. Sharma failed to clean the force on the basis of details available with Vagal. • Sri Kumar, had on March 4, 2003, communicated information regarding bail granted to Telgi in a case registered in Mumbai. Sharma merely initialled the letter which later went to Vagal. Sharma failed to promptly neutralise the functionaries responsible for allowing Telgi to obtain bail on flimsy grounds. Sharma has been asked to reply to the chargesheet within 10 days. Deputy Chief Minister Chhagan Bhujbal and Director General of Maharashtra Police S M Shingari declined to comment on the chargesheet.