Premium
This is an archive article published on November 4, 2002

Highway cleared of foreign ‘bumps’

...

.
int(4)
Managers
of the Russian firm Centrdorstroy. B B Yadav

Another sign that roadblocks to the Golden Quadrilateral (GQ) project will not be tolerated: two of the several firms that bagged work on the Delhi-Kolkata stretch of the GQ were recently threatened with termination of contracts. The reason, one that would have been tolerated in any other project anywhere else in the country: the two firms—one Russian, the other Chinese—were dragging their feet on their work.

According to progress reports maintained by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI), till early September the Russian firm, Centrdorstroy, had shown only 1.7% physical progress on the Fatehpur-Khaga and Handia-Varanasi (totalling 149 kms) packages they bagged. The other company verbally threatened with termination is the China Coal Construction Group which won the tender for the Shikohabad-Etawah stretch (59 kms) and, until last month, had shown only 0.59% physical progress.

While the two Russian contracts are worth Rs 550 cr, the China Coal Construction Group’s contract is pegged at Rs 261 cr.

Story continues below this ad

This is the first time since the GQ project took off that firms have been given the red ink treatment by Surface Transport Minister Lt General B C Khanduri (retd) and earned a contract-may-be-terminated warning against their names. Khanduri confirmed to The Indian Express that the contractors belonged to Russia and China, and that he had taken the extreme step of asking their senior bosses to fly in and meet him for consultations on possible termination.

Evidence of the doggedness with which construction along the GQ is being monitored in New Delhi comes from notes maintained by Khanduri. The 1,453 km Delhi-Kolkata stretch is being funded by the World Bank, and Khanduri admits that microscopic monitoring from Washington delayed signing of contracts. ‘Problems of language, unfamiliarity with Indian conditions and the absence of senior company officials slowed down the pace of work, he adds. ‘‘While Malaysian and Korean companies have shown good progress, the Russians and Chinese are lagging behind,’’ Khanduri said. ‘‘They did not have enough supervisory staff, could not mobilise equipment and that is why I told them we may even have to resort to termination. Now, they have brought a revised plan and we hope they can push through.’’

In Khaga and Varanasi, an interaction with Russian engineers and NHAI officials makes it apparent that Centrodorstroy was desperately trying to buy time. Alex Kovalev, the project manager at Khaga, said, ‘‘We did face some initial problems on this project but they are over now. We will be moving a lot of machinery on the road soon.’’ Alexander Dambalaev, the Russian project manager posted at Handia explained, ‘‘There was some communication gap with Indian officials soon after we came but that stage is over now. We will try complete the project in time.’’

The problems faced by Centrodorstroy seem to be accentuated by the fact that that they picked on Mukund Steel, a company which has no previous experience in road construction. Among the other Indian contractors they are ‘‘competing’’ with on other GQ packages are reputed firms like Somdutt Builders, IRCON, Oriental Structural Engineering and Progressive Engineering.

Story continues below this ad

Mukund’s DGM,Y S Subramaniyam, said that their Russian counterparts had now flown in more managerial staff and interpreters, and that initially they also faced some hurdles in the import of equipment from Russia. ‘‘There is a good understanding between the Russians and our company now. We are working on a crash programme and are even hoping to get the bonus for finishing the road before the Government’s deadline of substantial completion by December 2003.’’ And NHAI’s Member (Technical) Nirmaljit Singh explained the peculiar problems being faced by the Chinese firm: ‘‘For the Chinese, working in India is a new experience. They first faced a serious language problem and had to bring in interpreters. Because of the communication gap, they also thought people in India were out to fleece them.’’

Ritu Sarin is Executive Editor (News and Investigations) at The Indian Express group. Her areas of specialisation include internal security, money laundering and corruption. Sarin is one of India’s most renowned reporters and has a career in journalism of over four decades. She is a member of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) since 1999 and since early 2023, a member of its Board of Directors. She has also been a founder member of the ICIJ Network Committee (INC). She has, to begin with, alone, and later led teams which have worked on ICIJ’s Offshore Leaks, Swiss Leaks, the Pulitzer Prize winning Panama Papers, Paradise Papers, Implant Files, Fincen Files, Pandora Papers, the Uber Files and Deforestation Inc. She has conducted investigative journalism workshops and addressed investigative journalism conferences with a specialisation on collaborative journalism in several countries. ... Read More

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement