Premium
This is an archive article published on March 12, 1998

HLL to challenge Sebi order

MUMBAI, March 11: Hindustan Lever Ltd (HLL) has come out strongly against the Sebi verdict and has decided to appeal against the Sebi decisi...

.

MUMBAI, March 11: Hindustan Lever Ltd (HLL) has come out strongly against the Sebi verdict and has decided to appeal against the Sebi decision holding the company guilty of alleged insider trading in purchasing from the from UTI eight lakh shares of the erstwhile Brook Bond Lipton India (BBLIL) before the merger was announced in April 1996.

The company has, once again, categorically and unequivocally refuted the allegations, as it did in reply to Sebi’s `communication of findings’ on August 4, 1997. Backed by a string of eminent jurists and lawyers like PN Bhagwati and Arun Jaitley and KS Cooper, the company says it is confident that its stand will be vindicated by the appellate authority.

HLL in a press communique said that it will appeal to the Central Government (Union Finance Ministry), the appellate authority in such cases. HLL said that prosecution if launched will be contested.

Story continues below this ad

On Sebi’s view the company said: "Even taking Sebi’s view at face value, which the company strongly disagrees with, whatSebi does not take into account is that HLL had actually paid Rs 350.35 per share for the March 1996 transaction as against the ruling market price of Rs 318."

The company said it fails to understand how a transaction nine months later could form the basis for determining the compensation. It said that the interest alone on the payment of Rs 350.35 per share (a premium of 10 per cent) for purchasing the 8 lakh shares for the 9-month period, at a rate of 18 per cent per annum, is Rs 3.78 crore (Rs 47.30 per share). This is much more than the compensation Sebi has fixed, the company asserted, adding that Sebi totally overlooked this aspect.

HLL has been given 30-days time to appeal and HLL says it will do so. " HLL has no doubt whatsoever that it will stand vindicated." HLL maintains that the purchase of 8 lakh shares after direct negotiations was perfectly legal and valid, and UTI has made no grievance of it till date and further sold 4.7 lakh shares in December 1996.

HLL reiterated that it was in theknow of the proposed merger not as a connected company but as a primary party to the merger scheme with sister concern BBLIL. The company said that the news of the proposed merger was not unpublished and had been widely speculated.

Story continues below this ad

Among the legal luminaries, the company has quoted Justice Bhagwati’s as saying:"It is undoubtedly true that HLL and BBLIL were under the common management and HLL must, therefore, be deemed to be connected with BBLIL, but the knowledge about the proposed merger, could not be said to have been received by HLL."

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement