IBA, bank unions on warpath

MUMBAI, SEPT 25: The clash between the bank unions and the Indian Banks' Association over the seventh bipartite wage settlement is intens...

MUMBAI, SEPT 25: The clash between the bank unions and the Indian Banks’ Association over the seventh bipartite wage settlement is intensifying with the United Forum of Bank Unions threatening to "go to the streets" protesting the management body’s "misleading" stance.

The bank unions have taken a strong exception to the IBA threat of pulling out of the negotiations process. In a statement issued on Wednesday, the United Forum of Bank Unions – the umbrella organisation of the nine unions – said: "We are constrained to observe that the IBA’s statement – indicating that the bank unions are backing out from the commitments relating to superannuation benefits, as agreed in the memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed on March 11, 1999 – is misleading, mischievous, unwarranted, pro-acative and a distortion of facts."

In a statement issued on Tuesday, the bankers’ body had threatened to walk out of the seventh bipartite wage settlement unless the trade unions agree to accept the terms of the MoU signed inMarch.

Story continues below this ad

"Any deviation in the understanding and interpretation of the agreed points will amount to digressing from the MoU in which case the possibility of the member banks, who are already under tremendous financial pressure, pulling out en masse from the negotiations cannot be ruled out," IBA chief executive and secretary MN Dandekar had said.

The unions on Wednesday said that the IBA is trying to back out from its offer made on July 24, 1999 of negotiating the cost of pension. "It is unfortunate that the bankers’ body is indulging in dialogue of threats and intimidations, instead of negotiations," the forum statement said.

The unions have reiterated their commitment to the MoU and have demanded that the IBA fix up a immediate date for negotiations.

Reacting to the unions’ statement IBA secretary Dandekar said: "The banks are not in a position to offer more than 12.25 per cent hike as outlined in the memorandum of understanding. Under no circumstances, the load factor can be changed." The IBAmanagement committee is meeting on September 27 to take stock of the situation.

Story continues below this ad

The unions have been arguing that costing of pension for purpose of wage revision should be restricted to only 10 per cent of the basic pay per annum and the additional cost of 16.5 per cent cannot be carved out of the wage packet. This means that the additional cost will be over and above 12.25 per cent. The unions’ argument is that if the entire pension settlement is included in the total wage load, only 73.5 per cent of 12.25 per cent would be left for distribution among the various wage components.

IBA had earlier suggested that the employees’ unions discuss certain aspects of the proposed wage structure, specially the inclusion of retirement benefits into the load-factor’, with the individual banks. However, all the nine bank unions had unanimously rejected the IBA suggestion and reiterated a firm commitment to a uniform settlement covering the employees of all banks.

Banking sources said that the main grudge ofvarious employees’ unions revolves around IBA’s attempt to stonewall’ the entire process of settlement by refusing to negotiate the issue of distribution of load and charging 26.5 per cent basic pay for the pension scheme which is in lieu of the PF, as against the 10 per cent PF employees were contributing earlier.

The employees unions have noe urged IBA to come back to the negotiating table and settle the much awaited industry level settlement covering a million of workmen and officers. "We hope the IBA shall not force the employees to go to the streets," the statement said.