Premium
This is an archive article published on December 27, 2002

Indo-US pact: No extradition to tribunal

Vowing to bring to justice those who commit genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, India and the United States today signed an ag...

.

Vowing to bring to justice those who commit genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, India and the United States today signed an agreement not to extradite each other’s nationals to any international tribunal without express consent of the two countries.

The agreement, inked by Foreign Secretary Kanwal Sibal and US Ambassador to India Robert Blackwill, stipulates that each country will not knowingly facilitate, consent to or cooperate with efforts by any third party or country for the extradition, surrender or transfer of each other’s nationals to any international tribunal.

This can be considered only if the two sides are otherwise obligated to do so by an international agreement to which they are parties. ‘‘India and the US share the strongest possible commitment to bringing to justice those who commit war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide,’’ Blackwill told reporters at Hyderabad House shortly after the accord was signed.

Story continues below this ad

‘‘However, we are concerned about the International Criminal Court Treaty with respect to the adequacy of checks and balances, the impact of the treaty on national sovereignty and the potential for conflict with the UN charter,’’ he said.

He said the new accord was ‘‘emblematic of the strides that continue to be made in transforming US-India relations. Both governments look forward to working in close cooperation on such significant issues.’’

The two sides said where appropriate, they would investigate and prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide alleged to have been committed by their respective officials, military personnel and nationals.

The accord provides that in the absence of any express consent by either country, such persons would not be surrendered or transferred by any means to any other entity or third country or expelled to a third country unless otherwise obligated to do so.

Story continues below this ad

It further stipulates that when either government extradites, surrenders or otherwise transfers its nationals to a third country, it will not agree to the surrender or transfer of that person by the third country to any international tribunal.

The agreement will enter into force after an exchange of notes confirming that they have completed the necessary domestic legal requirements for this purpose. ‘‘It will remain in force until one year after the date on which one one party notifies the other of its intent to terminate this agreement,’’ it said.

Both India and the US have been laying emphasis on the sanctity of national judicial processes and voiced reservations over cases of human rights violations going to multilateral courts like the International Criminal Court or the International Court of Justice for adjudication.

In effect, if a third country or party demands that a person of Indian or American origin wanted for such crimes in each other’s country be tried in a multilateral court, it will not be possible unless permission is given by the respective governments or the sides are mandated to do so under any international pact.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement