Premium
This is an archive article published on July 20, 1997

Navy dawdles over submarine overhaul

NEW DELHI, July 19: Even after five years, the Indian Navy has not completed a medium refit of a Russian-built submarine -- a task which sh...

.

NEW DELHI, July 19: Even after five years, the Indian Navy has not completed a medium refit of a Russian-built submarine — a task which should otherwise be executed within two to two-and-half years.

INS Sindhugosh (S-55), a Russian Kilo class 877 EKM submarine which entered service in 1986, started a normal refit in 1992 at the naval dockyard in Visakhapatnam. However, this was later extended to a medium refit for which the time frame kept stretching due to poor planning, weak decision-making and inadequate material management procedures. The delay occurred despite the Navy holding an annual refit conference where an annual refit plan was charted for planning procedures.

The inordinate delay has prompted the Navy to send INS Sindhuvir (S-57), another Kilo class submarine, to Severdminsk in the North Sea near Murmansk, Russia for a medium refit. The refit could cost about Rs 50 crore. This works out cheaper than an indigenous one, according to an informed estimate.

Story continues below this ad

The maintenance cycles for submarines are sacrosanct. After every three short refits, a boat undergoes a normal refit. After three such normal refits it has to go in for a medium refit.This involves activities in the dry dock where the hull and engines are repaired, sea openings overhauled, hydraulic systems rectified, cables changed, batteries replaced and anti-corrosive paint applied.

The rationale for a refit not adhering to its time frame could well be the distinction between the nature of work undertaken in repair and production organisations. Unlike production organisations where planning is possible, work in a repair establishment (like a naval dockyard) is open-ended as new defects are discovered during the dismantling process, creating new demands for spares and consequently leading to delays.

The Director General Naval Projects, an agency which specialises in civil construction works, has not been able to adhere to the specified time frames. This has resulted in the absence of infrastructure like buildings for housing jigs, fixtures and test benches to carry out Kilo class submarine refits as per plan. This in turn distorts the maintenance schedules for other submarines. While two Kilo class subs are under medium refit, a couple of others would be ready for short refits. This ties up four to five submarines in dry docks, leaving only a few submarines for seaworthy duties.

That the Navy, despite being endowed with two dockyards and two ship-repair yards which employ skilled technical manpower, has to send a submarine to Russia for a medium refit underlines a serious problem with Kilo class submarines. The engineering infrastructure here is only capable of handling short and normal refits lasting for three months and one year respectively.

Story continues below this ad

In contrast, the Navy does not face the same problem with the medium refits for German HDW submarines as the dockyard’s civilian technical personnel have been trained intensively by the manufacturer. This was also because the HDW was earlier slated to be manufactured in the country.

The documentation which provides detailed instructions on assembling and removing on-board systems enables easy understanding to execute faster work. As a result HDW subs are put out more often to sea than the Kilo class.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement