Premium
This is an archive article published on October 29, 1998

Romesh Sharma is arrested again

NEW DELHI, October 28: While Romesh Sharma's police remand ended today, he was arrested in another case in the courtroom itself.There was...

.

NEW DELHI, October 28: While Romesh Sharma’s police remand ended today, he was arrested in another case in the courtroom itself.

There was high drama both inside and outside the Patiala House court. Sharma’s sloganeering supporters had to be restrained by a 40-strong group of policemen outside, even as a battery of defence lawyers argued his case inside.

Sharma was today arrested in connection with a case filed by Sanjay Sabharwal on October 22 at the Hauz Khas Police Station. He has been remanded to judicial custody until October 30.

Story continues below this ad

The decibel level inside the courtroom increased in alarming proportions as lawyers tried to explain the case to Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) Jai Prakash Narain. The MM was confused by the fact that there were so many different cases against Sharma, and even took a short recess.

Sanjay Sabharwal was also present in court and correctly identified Sharma. In his complaint (FIR no. 867/98) he alleged that Sharma had illegally taken over his C-41 Anand Niketan property in south Delhi.

Investigating Officer (IO) Rajiv Medha asked for Sharma’s remand, saying that the police also needed to recover the goods allegedly stolen by Sharma from Sabharwal.

The case took an interesting turn at this point, when defence lawyers argued that Sabharwal had earlier filed a similar FIR (538/96) at the Connaught Place Police Station in 1996. They also told the MM that the case had come up in the Delhi High Court, which passed a judgment in Sharma’s favour in 1997.

Story continues below this ad

When the MM questioned Sabharwal, he said that he had filed an earlier complaint, but since he “didn’t get any relief” he decided to try his luck at the Hauz Khas Police Station.

Remanding Sharma to judicial custody for two days, the MM directed the IO to confirm whether both the complaints are for the same offence.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement