Premium
This is an archive article published on April 11, 2000

SC firm on implementation of ban on old commercial vehicles

NEW DELHI, APRIL 10: The Supreme Court today firmly said it would not succumb to pressure tactics like strikes to relax its April 1 deadli...

.

NEW DELHI, APRIL 10: The Supreme Court today firmly said it would not succumb to pressure tactics like strikes to relax its April 1 deadline for scrapping of over eight-year-old commercial vehicles and asked the Delhi Government to file a compliance report on implementation of the deadline.

A three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice A S Anand, Justice B N Kirpal and Justice V N Khare, while hearing a public interest litigation on curbing vehicular pollution, asked Additional Solicitor General Kirit Rawal, who appeared for Delhi Government, to file the report by next week.

The court, by its July 28, 1998 order, had made it clear that no commercial vehicles which were over eight years old would be allowed to ply in the Capital after April 1, 2000.

Story continues below this ad

However, it had said that over eight-year-old buses could ply only after converting to Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) as fuel.

Meanwhile, the Action Committee of Unaided Private Schools withdrew its application seeking relaxation of the July 28 order after the court pointed out that it did not contain necessary data and was also without an undertaking as to when they would implement the order.

Similar application by Delhi Public School, which had sought time till June 30, was kept for hearing next week.

The bench, while hearing the matter, referred to the strike resorted to by taxis and autorickshaws and observed, "This court will not work under any kind of pressure."

Story continues below this ad

Rawal submitted before the court that over eight-year-old three-wheelers might be allowed to ply in the Capital after they converted their engines to run on CNG.

The bench sent this application to the Bhure Lal Committee, which was set up by the court to suggest ways and means to curb vehicular pollution, to give its comments within two weeks.

Amicus Curiae in the case, Harish Salve, submitted it waswrong on the part of taxi and autorickshaw unions to resort to strike and said the taxi owners have even given a statement that they would continue to run their old taxis till police arrested them.

The Bench said "there is no question of making exceptionsfor anybody" and added "relaxing the order will create a lot of problemts."

Story continues below this ad

Salve said the court should also consider whether thevehicles could be run on fuel other than CNG and referred to the recent decision of the Centre to allow the vehicles to run on LPG.

He also said there has been largescale mixing ofkerosene with diesel resulting in heavy pollution.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement