Premium
This is an archive article published on April 25, 2007

Still pie in the sky

India has some way to go to be competitive in the satellite launch business

.

The 11th successful flight of the Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV), carrying and launching for a fee an Italian astronomical satellite, is a significant achievement for the India Space Research Organisation (ISRO). This is the first step towards ISRO’s progress to becoming a serious player in the international space launch business. Commercial international launch of satellites, especially communication satellites, is a billion dollar business. Together with the cost of the satellites themselves, the communication satellite business runs into billions of dollars.

ISRO already has an edge in the fabrication of satellites. It has a long experience of building all types of satellites from earth observation satellites to weather satellites to communication satellites. It does not, however, at the present moment have a launch vehicle for putting communication satellites in geostationary orbits. It must now concentrate its efforts in successfully developing the Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV) as soon as possible so that it can enter this market. Development of the GSLV will enable ISRO to launch Indian satellites as well as reduce its dependence on the European Space Agency. Beyond GSLV, ISRO can develop reusable launch vehicles (RLVs) as well, thereby further reducing launch costs as well as the lead time for launch preparation, and so on. Currently, active in the communication satellite launch business are the space agencies of the United States, Russia, the European Union and China. Of these only the US has developed successful RLVs.

However, much more needs to be done on other fronts as well before ISRO can become a major player in the launch of communication satellites (comsat). The US is a major supplier of a large number of systems, equipment and components used in the fabrication of comsats. These require export licences from the US.

Story continues below this ad

The US strengthened its export licensing requirements in 1989 after congressional hearings revealed that the Chinese authorities had been given unauthorised technical information by some American companies after the failure of a US communication satellite launch by China. US licensing procedures often take a long time. After repeated complaints from US firms, and its allies as well, about the delays in licensing, the US Congress authorised the department of state to establish a regulatory regime for the expeditious licensing of commercial communications satellite technologies, their components and systems to the US, NATO and major non-NATO allies, whilst ensuring priority to “national security and US obligations under the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)”.

The new regime’s main feature is its ability to use high volume licences for components and technical data for multiple shipments to any of the NATO and major non-NATO allies within an approved framework, without having to meet complex documentary requirements normally associated with such exports. Since India is neither a NATO nor a major non-NATO ally, it cannot be the beneficiary of these relaxed licensing procedures. Incidentally, Pakistan as a major non-NATO ally is entitled to these facilities although it does not have any launch or satellite fabrication capabilities.

In addition, the launch of US built communication satellites involves complex export control procedures.

If India is to leverage its competitive strengths in satellite fabrication (which are already there) and its competitive launch services (later when GSLV is successful) and bid for both fabrication and launch of communication satellites within a tight framework, it needs to be part of the new US comsat regime, as most communication satellites use US parts, etc. This would intensify government-to-government discussions and negotiations. Fortunately, after the Next Steps in Strategic Partnership (NSSP), licensing procedures for ISRO have been relaxed as compared with earlier times when ISRO and its various units were sanctioned by the US government.

Story continues below this ad

Indeed, after the US government licensed the export to Malaysia of MEASAT communications satellites, in late 2002, it also made an amendment to an already existing technical assistance agreement to add Antrix Corporation Ltd, the commercial and marketing arm of ISRO, and to export to Antrix technical data and defence services in support of marketing activities for the sale of communications satellites to the Malaysian firm, Binariang Satellite Systems, for the MEASAT programme. Subsequently, in late 2004, in the presence of the Indian and Malaysian prime ministers, Antrix corporation and MEASAT International signed an agreement for the joint marketing of satellite capacity and a letter of intent for the procurement, launch and putting into orbit of MEASAT-4 satellite from the Antrix Corporation.

In addition, for providing communications satellite services, fabrication with US components and launch of US communications satellites, the completion of a number of technical assistance agreements must be negotiated between the two countries.

Therefore, before ISRO can become a serious player in the international communications satellite launch business, a number of things need to be done on a priority basis. First, the GSLV needs to be successfully developed. Second, negotiations with the US to include India amongst the countries eligible for the comsat licensing procedures should begin. And third, technical assistance agreements need to be negotiated.

All these are complex operations, and the process of completion of these requires to be started now. Only then can ISRO leverage its technical strengths and cost effective programmes, to become a strong competitor to the other communications satellite fabrication and launch service providers. It can also suitably leverage the current improved Indo-US relations to forge collaboration with American firms to jointly offer these services to the US and third parties.

Story continues below this ad

The writer is a visiting fellow, Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses and the National Maritime Foundation, Delhi

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement