
That the government has finally started abandoning the notion that classically defined farming can grow at four per cent is a relief. Krishi Bhavan, as reported in this newspaper, will be setting crop and sector targets at the state level, with a recognition that horticulture and animal husbandry can be growth drivers. But setting uniform strategies suggests insufficient homework. Milk is an example. In eastern and central India and in the Northeast, milk is still marketed by the unorganised sector. Amul, in contrast, is at the stage of marketing probiotic ice creams and sugarless chocolates.
At a broader level, diversification away from crops
It is equally important that food production itself be viewed differently. Diversification is not only relevant here, it is already happening and farmers come to much grief when government policies don’t recognise this. As has been argued on these pages, to think of wheat as an undifferentiated commodity is one of the mistakes the government makes when deciding on procurement and pricing policies. Efficient, market-savvy farmers are not a rarity on the ground. They just don’t find much representation in policy papers. Neither do facts like the need for consolidation — a majority of farm landholdings in India are, bluntly put, economically unviable production bases. Krishi Bhavan will take time to acknowledge such truths. But let us acknowledge that at least someone in the sarkar is not breezily demanding traditional farming magically grow at 4 per cent.


