The last time we met Elizabeth Costello, she was fragmenting. Veteran of theseminar-literary-awards circuit, aging writer held in high regard by academia especially for House on Eccles Street, a re-imagining of Ulysses, fervent animal rights activist, she was allegorically seated outside a gate. Asked to explain herself and her life, she was sinking into a quicksand of possible reasons for being: “I am a writer, a trader in fictions.” “I maintain beliefs only provisionally.” “I am a secretary of the invisible.” By the time we meet her again, a novel later, Elizabeth has—remarkably, mysteriously —gathered herself together and is grounded in a simple synopsis of her mission: “You may not see the point of it,” she says, “the pursuit of intuitions, but this is what I do. This is how I have built my life: by following up intuitions, including those I cannot at first make sense of. Above all those I cannot at first make sense of.” In Slow Man, his first novel written after receiving the Nobel prize for literature in 2003, JM Coetzee springs a surprise: he appears to return to an earlier plot-line. He’s not done that before. Hailed by the Nobel academy for being a scrupulous doubter, for being “ruthless in his criticism of the cruel rationalism and cosmetic morality of western civilisation”, he has never lingered at a subject. His conscientiousinterrogations have, for instance, taken him from critiques of apartheid to a cutting inquiry into the aftermath of its dismantling (Disgrace). He is a master deployer of irony, and his fiction does not suffer gladly readers who’d have the world comfortably separated into good and evil. He, most of all, carries his story a long way from the reader’s initial expectations. So it is with Slow Man. It opens with Paul Rayment, a sixtysomething former photographer and diligent, sometimes self-righteous collector of old and rare stills, being tossed off his bicycle by a speeding vehicle. It picks up an unsettling atmosphere when he returns to his upmarket Adelaide apartment, with a leg amputated and a newly acquired awareness of lurking mortality, that he may never be whole again. Given over to care-givers for routine chores, he finds his sense of self being chipped away. What has his life amounted to? Has he wasted time? Or is he being wasted by time?