Wildflower Hall in Shimla, the former residence and haven of Lord Horatio Herbert Kitchener of Khartoum (1850-1916), the victorious Imperial Field Marshall, who retreated into this hill town for some respite after battling the Boers in South Africa is today the scene of a pitched battle between the Himachal Pradesh BJP government and East India Hotels owned by the Oberoi hotel chain. The Rs 40-crore joint venture partnership, which heralded a new era of cooperation in 1995 between the thenCongress government and the Oberois to run Wildflower Hall as a luxury hotel, has simply collapsed. If it was not for the high price that both the parties are paying today, it could have been billed as a typical government-sponsored Comedy of Terrors. Consider the following: Congress Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh, invigorated by the winds of liberalisation sweeping the country in the early ’90s, invites tenders to rebuild the prestigious Wildflower Hall, which had burned to cinder after a devastating winter fire in early 1993. Singh was determined to embrace economic reforms by forging strategic partnerships with the private sector. But the government of the day was still in the grip of socialist dogma, and could not let go completely. So, instead of looking for an outright sale of property, it opted for a joint venture. Next morning, government officials escorted by a police posse marched into the lobby to take over the hotel but intervention by the Company Law Board stopped the illegal takeover. Two months later, Dhumal explains: ‘‘It is not the duty of state governments to run hotels but its interests must be safeguarded. Let us evaluate the property again and let the Oberois pay lease money for it. I think they are now coming around.’’ Chief Secretary Harsh Gupta clearly wants the government to pull out of the deal. Dhumal waves away his own accusations saying, ‘‘ Let’s look ahead.” While the government is adamant in turning the Wildflower Hall land from freehold into a leasehold, the Oberois have proposed buying the shares held by the former at a price fixed by an international evaluator. ‘‘Outright sale is also a possibility,” says Gupta, ‘‘but there will be no third party.” The Oberois say this shows government’s fear of being exposed. Says Biki Oberoi “We are not prepared to negotiate under pressure. First, they should remove all the roadblocks; give us the NOC and permission to open the remaining 60 rooms. It is a year since we opened and we are allowed to operate only 28 rooms. The revenue we are losing is mindboggling. They waited for us to open the hotel to begin the harassment, and thought we would capitulate under pressure. But we know we are right, we will continue to stick to our stand.” As a bewildering array of people descend on this Queen of Hill Stations for the season, once reputed to be the haunt of both the philanderer and fortune-hunter, perhaps it is time for the government to shed its inhibitions and suspicions about private enterprise and take it to its logical end. GOVT POINT 1. The Oberois failed to make the hotel operational within the given period. 2. They illegally changed the equity distribution ratio from 65:35 to 78:22. 3. The group jacked up the costs by more than 100 per cent. 4. It gave large sums of money to associate companies in the garb of getting technical assistance from them. 5. It failed to provide technical services according to agreement. 6. The delay in commissioning the project led to escalation of cost.OBEROI COUNTERPOINT 1. The hotel was operational in April, 2001, within stipulated time. 2. The government did not buy the rights shares offered to it. 3. The budget shot up when the hotel was upgraded to the ‘Vilas’ category. 4. Payments were made for technical assistance only after approval by Board, which has government’s representatives. 5. The hotel was given technical services by the Oberois. 6. Government did not speed up the sanctions needed to complete the project.