Last June,with a financial hurricane gathering force,Treasury secretary Henry Paulson convened the nations economic stewards for a brainstorming session. What emergency powers might the government want at its disposal to confront the crisis? he asked.
Timothy Geithner,who as president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank oversaw many of the most powerful financial institutions,stunned the group with the audacity of his answer. He proposed asking Congress to give the president broad power to guarantee all the debt in the banking system. The proposal quickly died amid protests that it was politically untenable because it could put taxpayers on the hook for trillions of dollars.
But in the 10 months since then,the government has in many ways embraced his prescription. Through an array of new programs,the Fed and Treasury have assumed an unprecedented role in the banking system,using unprecedented amounts of taxpayer money.
And more often than not,Geithner has been a leading architect of those bailouts. Today,Geithner is Treasury secretary,and as he seeks to rebuild the nations financial system with taxpayer assistance and a regulatory overhaul,he finds himself a locus of discontent.
An examination of Geithners five years as president of the Fed shows that he forged unusually close relationships with executives of Wall Streets giant financial institutions. His actions,as a regulator and later a bailout king,often aligned with the industrys interests and desires,according to interviews with financiers,regulators and analysts and a review of Fed records.
Geithner said his actions in the bailout were motivated solely by a desire to help businesses and consumers. But in a financial crisis,he added,the government has to take risk,and we are going to be doing things which ultimately are going to benefit the institutions that are at the core of the problem.