Premium
This is an archive article published on May 31, 2009

Havent forgotten Sachar promise: JD-U

Determined to reinforce its secular credentials,the JD-U on Saturday vowed to honour its pre-poll promise to implement the Sachar Committee recommendations...

Determined to reinforce its secular credentials,the JD(U) on Saturday vowed to honour its pre-poll promise to implement the Sachar Committee recommendations in Bihar and backed the reservation demand of Dalit Christians. The JD(U),which had originally made this commitment in its election manifesto,pressed the refresh button on the document at the partys national executive meeting here.

Later,party general secretary Shivanand Tewari articulated the JD(U) stance on minority-related issues and took pains to dispel any impression of the Nitish Kumar Government being shackled by ally BJPs Hindutva agenda. We have shown zero-tolerance for communalism… There has been no incident of communal tension during our rule, he said. Tewari ruled out any break-up with the BJP,but kept the window open for a change by inserting a qualifier as of now.

The BJP has called the Sachar Committee report divisive and opposed the demand of Dalit Christians for reservations on par with their Dalit Hindu counterparts. However,in Bihar,the BJP,as a junior partner,has silently gone along with Nitish Kumar in implementing his minority agenda.

Story continues below this ad

Asked if the party would take a cue from Orissa CM Naveen Patnaik who parted ways with the BJP just before the polls and returned to power with a huge majority,Tewari said Patnaik may have had some problem with them,but there is nothing like this in Bihar.

However,Bihar JD(U) president Rajiv Ranjan Singh Lallan,a close confidante of Nitish Kumar,was critical of the BJP position on several issues. Tewari did not push the matter under the carpet either. In an obvious reference to the projection of Narendra Modi as a future PM candidate,the JD(U) general secretary said the NDA prospects were undermined by certain issues raised during elections,which were not required.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement