The horrendous acts of terror in Norway on July 22 have cast a flashlight on the painful but a major social transformation that Europe is going through. The massacre of 77 innocent persons by Anders Behring Breivik,a militant votary of (culturally) Christian Europe,has outraged the civilised world and been universally condemned. But thinly hidden behind the curtain of condemnation is a raging debate among Europeans on where their respective countries are,and ought to be,headed.
Breivik,in a hate-filled manifesto issued before he carried out the bombing and shooting spree,denounced Norways left-leaning government for tolerating Muslim immigration. The growing Muslim population in Europe,along with the relative non-integration of Muslims into the native societies and cultures,has created a problem that none can deny. Breivik used evil and completely unjustifiable means to highlight the rapidly changing religious demography and cultural identity of Europe. His action is symptomatic of the failure of many in Europe to come to terms with history coming full circle. Its a history that began with Christian-Muslim conflicts in the medieval period,colonial injustice by European powers,steady weakening of Christianity,and Europes politico-economic-cultural decline in recent decades. Europe turning into Eurabia may be an exaggeration,but apprehensions on this score are no longer limited to the xenophobic,racist and extremist fringe.
As a Hindu,I have been provoked by Breiviks evil act to do considerable soul-searching,especially since his manifesto makes some approving references to Hindutva,as he has (wrongly) understood it. It may suit the narrow political and personal agendas of some Congress politicians in India to use the Norway incident to further defame the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) for its espousal of Hindutva. But Hindutva,in its proper sense,has no place for hatred for non-Hindu faiths. RSS certainly has many shortcomings in the articulation of its vision and in its practical activities. However,based on my understanding of,and contact with,the organisation (of which I remain a critical admirer),I affirm that it can never condone Breiviks devilish deed. It has indeed categorically condemned his barbaric action.
Dragging the name of RSS in the context of acts of terror committed in recent years by some Hindu extremists is motivated by the UPA governments political considerations. Investigative agencies,acting under the diktat of their political bosses,have falsely linked its senior functionary,Indresh Kumar,to these terrorist acts. I have worked very closely with the RSS-sponsored Muslim Rashtriya Manch,which Indreshji guided. Having seen his passion and genuine efforts for the cause of Hindu-Muslim amityI always used to wonder why his work was not adopted by the entire RSS organisationI feel morally obliged to vouch for his integrity and innocence.
In the context of the debate on Breivik,critics of the RSS would do well to read a candid and thought-provoking address that Justice KT Thomas,a former Supreme Court judge,delivered in Kochi last week. Speaking as chief guest at the Guru Pooja function of the RSS,in the presence of its chief Mohan Bhagwat,Thomas said,I am a church going Christian…(But) the propaganda that the RSS is anti-minority is a baseless propaganda.
The relentless slander of the RSS by the Congress partys functionaries must stop. At the same time,the RSS also must self-critically examine why most non-Hindus,and many Hindus too,remain sceptical about its vision. For example,Dr Subramanian Swamy,a Hindu ideologue who is close to the RSS,has recently argued that non-Hindus who refuse to acknowledge that their ancestors were Hindus should not have voting rights. RSS (and BJP) leaders must slam this indefensible and unconstitutional talk. Its time RSS affirmed that Indias way of achieving national integration,for which our country is globally admired,is through our culture of tolerance,mutual respect,nonviolence and other universal human values.
sudheenkulkarni@gmail.com