Opinion For the sake of debate
If only there was a third contender,intelligent and independent,to shake up the US presidential race
If only there was a third contender,intelligent and independent,to shake up the US presidential race
Eventually the circular firing squad that is the Republican primary will be over and the last man standing will be the partys nominee for president. If that candidate is Rick Santorum,I think there is a good chance a Third Party will try to fill the space between the really severely conservative Santorum (or even Mitt Romney) and the left-of-centre Barack Obama. It would be fitting. After all,this is the 20th anniversary of Ross Perots independent candidacy. Perot won close to 20 per cent of the vote,and his success was instrumental in making deficit reduction one of Bill Clintons top priorities. An independent candidate in 2012 who was a little more,shall we say,normal than Perot could have an equally big impact on the winner. I still dont know if Id support an independent. But I know what Id pay good money to see: an intelligent independent candidate just taking part in the presidential debates,because it would make both Obama and his Republican opponent better. One independent Id like to see play that role is David Walker.
Walker was the countrys chief auditor,serving from 1998 to 2008 as the US comptroller general. He is currently the chief executive of the Comeback America Initiative,a non partisan group dedicated to getting Americas fiscal house in order. Walker who came in second to Hillary Clinton in a reader poll that Politico conducted last October for favourite Third Party candidate told me he has no desire to run but that hes been speaking across the country,trying to do what Perot did.
He did three things, says Walker. He woke up the American people to the truth about our fiscal situation in clear,concise and compelling terms. He made the presidential debates much more substantive,and he helped to set the next presidents agenda,and,as a result,we made great progress in reducing the deficit from 1993 to 2000. Now we have lost all of that and more.
Walkers view is simple: We are not Greece,where the government grew too big,promised too much and waited too long to restructure,but were making many of the same mistakes. Because of the size of the US economy and the dollars role as a global reserve currency,we have some time to get our house in order,but we are not immune from the laws of prudent finance.
Alas,both of our major parties behave as though we are. The Democrats,argues Walker,are still in denial about the need to renegotiate our social insurance contract. Walker praises Obama for focusing on the right metric our overall debt-to-GDP ratio and in offering short-term ideas to enhance economic growth and address unemployment,like investments in infrastructure. But these ideas,he says,have to be coupled with a credible and enforceable plan to address the structural deficits that threaten our nations future position in the world and our standard of living at home and there Obama continues to fall short.
As for Republicans,says Walker,they dont have a plan to restore fiscal sanity either. Theyre in denial we can solve our structural deficit problems with either our current level of taxation between 15 and 16 per cent of GDP or even with our historical average,about 18 per cent of GDP. We need more revenue. Our deficit problem is primarily a spending problem,but it is not only a spending problem. We need $1 in new revenue for every $3 in spending cuts,excluding interest,says Walker and that should be accomplished through tax reform that makes our system simpler,fairer and more competitive, while generating more revenue. The Republicans are in denial about this.
The American people are starved for three things, concludes Walker: truth,leadership and solutions. Unfortunately,the two parties are just offering laggardship waiting for something to hit the fan so they can again just react without adequate due diligence.
After months of nutty,gravity-free Republican primary debates,how great would it be to have presidential debates in which a smart independent like Walker was in the middle to challenge both sides and offer sensible solutions?