Opinion The Third Edit: A new history of the human race, one footprint at a time
Kenya’s findings can turn a page in our study of human evolution and ask an imperative question - which ‘fittest’ species survived?

Fictional sleuths have nothing on real-life palaeontologists. Sherlock Holmes and his ilk have pored over many a footprint, cigarette stub and bit of ash, magnifying glass in hand. The tools of the modern palaeontologist are more sophisticated but essentially of the same order, but the questions they investigate are far more difficult, the answers much less definitive. Each incremental finding tells the world a little more about its past and possibly offers lessons for the present. Researchers have found, in footprints in the sand in Kenya, a part of the hominid story that speaks to human evolution.

For too long, “survival of the fittest” was interpreted in the narrowest, most aggressive terms and used to justify every manner of human oppression — from racism to colonialism. Homo sapiens were presented as an aggressive species, which eradicated its “competitors” to emerge as dominant. Over recent years, though, the sleuthing of palaeontologists and genetic evidence has shown that people did not just conquer, they shared and assimilated: Several men and women across the world have both Neanderthal and Denovisian (other “human” species) DNA. Perhaps the people behind the footprints in the sand weren’t just competitors. Perhaps they were also neighbours, even friends.